The American legal system is intricate and often misunderstood. Many people go about their daily lives without truly understanding how the law works, what rights they have, or how to navigate the complex web of legislation. This post aims to shed light on the essential aspects of lawfare and how it impacts our legal environment.
An interesting point to consider is how law school graduates, despite their extensive training, may struggle to recall the original ten amendments of the Bill of Rights. Many of these graduates are immersed in a system that emphasizes legal jargon over foundational constitutional rights.
Additionally, amendments 11 through 27 were introduced after the Republic was formed, often without direct input from the public. This situation raises critical concerns about their legitimacy and relevance in today's legal landscape.
Understanding Lawfare: A Tool for Control
Lawfare refers to the use of legal systems to achieve political or military objectives, effectively using the law as a weapon. This practice has significant implications for individuals who are often unaware of how their rights are compromised by administrative procedures.
To combat this, it is crucial for citizens to educate themselves about their rights and legal options. A powerful approach is to bring public officials to an Article III Common Law suit.
Common Law, which is established by Federal District Courts, is not commonly encountered in everyday life. Instead, many people inadvertently consent to administrative tribunals, unknowingly giving up their rights in the process. Research indicates that over 90% of cases resolve in these administrative settings—often to the detriment of individual rights.
The Importance of a Common Law Jury
Due process guarantees constitutional protection that can only be fully realized through a Common Law jury. Yet, how often do we see individuals demanding this right in high-profile cases? For instance, recent trials involving notable figures, such as former President Trump, have highlighted gaps in legal protections.
Take, for example, the case of Daniel Penny. He faced significant delays and challenges because he did not assert his 7th Amendment right to a Common Law jury. This amendment preserves the right to a jury trial in civil cases when the value exceeds twenty dollars. Despite its importance, many people, including legal professionals, overlook its significance.
This brings to light the confusing nature of legal terminology. A term like "Manhattan Supreme Court" can mislead many; it is not a true Supreme Court but rather an administrative tribunal often lacking genuine legal rights. In these scenarios, individuals like Daniel Penny may unwittingly forfeit their constitutional rights by agreeing to participate in administrative settings.
The 7th Amendment: A Historical Perspective
The 7th Amendment states: “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury.” This statement is not just a formality; it is essential for maintaining justice. However, individuals frequently accept legal proceedings that bypass this right, opting for systems that may not protect their freedoms.
The implications can be severe. For example, Kyle Rittenhouse faced a tumultuous legal situation, yet he benefited from undeniable visual evidence. If every citizen knew their legal rights, they could push for due process through a Common Law jury, fundamentally altering the course of legal proceedings.
Educating the Masses: The Role of Inalienable University
At Inalienable University, efforts are underway to inform people about their rights through education on Common Law principles. This project aims to awaken the average citizen's understanding of their inalienable rights and how to effectively assert them. By simplifying the legal framework, the initiative demystifies the legal processes that often feel overly complicated.
A Call to Action
Now more than ever, it is time to be proactive about understanding our legal rights. Knowledge is power as you navigate the complex legal landscape. Demand your rights, learn about Common Law, and never settle for less than what the Constitution guarantees.
While the American legal system can seem intimidating, it is crucial to reclaim your legal heritage. By knowing your rights and confidently advocating for them, you can reclaim your agency within a complicated judicial structure.
The true challenge lies not only in becoming familiar with the law but also in learning how to engage with it. When ordinary people become aware of their rights, they can influence the American legal system while asserting their voice and agency.
Let us take a stand for the rights that are inherently ours. By educating ourselves, we ensure that justice, equity, and due process remain alive in our society.
Gianna & Scott
Comentários